Explaining fonts in California courts

Explaining Fonts In California Courts

Using the right fonts in California courts is important legal professionals looking to be as smooth as possible in their cases, but what is the right font?

When the focus of your briefs must be the content and conveying vital information to support your case, it can be easy to keep the visual details of the actual page set at the minimum standards of the law.

But with typography, the visual component of the written word, you have the opportunity to make your documents stand out, to create a positive reading experience for the judges and clerks who will be looking at them.

The font is only one of many aspects of typography, and something we’ve been getting a lot of questions about lately. So here is a summary of our philosophy when it comes to the ideal fonts in California courts for legal documents.

Legal document font style and size

There are many standards that are broadly conformed to at the federal level. Let’s use this opportunity to go over several aspects of font and style that are applicable in many differing juridictions:

Font type

Proportionally spaced fonts are preferred for legibility.

Commonly used fonts:

  • Times New Roman
  • Arial
  • Calibri
  • Helvetica

Font size

The minimum font size is usually 12 points for the main body of the text.

Some courts might accept 11-point font for footnotes or smaller sections, but it is safer to stick to 12 points unless otherwise specified.


Typically, margins should be at least 1 inch on all sides.


Double-spacing is the standard for the body of the document.

Single spacing may be used for certain elements such as block quotes, footnotes, and captions.

Headers and footers

Headers often include the case name, case number, and sometimes the name of the document.

Page numbers are typically placed in the footer or header.


The first line of each paragraph is usually indented.


Left alignment is standard for the main body of text.

Some elements like headings may be centered.

“Essentially equivalent”

When making recommendations for fonts used in documents that will be eFiled in the California court, we consider both the court rules and overall readability.

Court rules

As shown above, California Title Two rules state that the fonts used in submitted documents must be “essentially equivalent” to Courier, Times New Roman, or Arial. The law does not require your document to be in one of these fonts, just that the font you use be similar to these standard system fonts.

For filing legal documents into California courts, it’s important to adhere to the specific formatting and font requirements set by the court.

According to the California Rules of Court, Rule 2.104, the font and formatting requirements are as follows:

  1. Font Type: The font must be a proportionally spaced font.
  2. Font Size: The type size must be at least 12 points.
  3. Font Example: Common acceptable fonts include Times New Roman, Courier, Arial, or other similar fonts that are proportionally spaced.

Additionally, documents must be double-spaced, except for certain elements like block quotations, footnotes, and captions, which may be single-spaced.

It’s always a good idea to check the local rules of the specific court where you are filing, as there might be additional requirements or variations.

Matthew Butterick, in his book Typography for Lawyers (which we have discussed before and highly recommend), has a straightforward explanation of his interpretation:

“If the rules call for a specific font or point size, use it. For instance, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(a)(2) requires either 14-point Times New Roman or 12-point Courier New. In that case, you have no discretion. Follow the rule.”

He continues,

“If the rules call for a font that’s similar to a particular font, use your discretion carefully. For instance, Calif. Rule of Court 2.105 requires a font that is “essentially equivalent to Courier, Times New Roman, or Arial.” I take this to mean you should use a font that has the general legibility and length characteristics of Courier, Times New Roman, or Arial…I don’t take the rule to mean you can only use those three fonts. If the rule meant that, it would have said so.”

We know, in fact, that other states, like Florida, do require lawyers to use very specific fonts to file documents in. Massachusetts, Alabama, and New Jersey “essentially force” appeals court attorneys to use Courier, an old-fashioned typeface that was designed in the lettering of electronic typewriters. There is no room for interpretation, that is the requirement.

So, when California gives three different traditional fonts as guidelines, we take that to mean that they are looking for professional fonts in the style of those three traditional choices rather than a single static option.

Why is it important to follow the rules of the court when using fonts?

Aside from the obvious downside of irritating judges and clerks, following the rules for fonts and formatting in California courts is crucial for several reasons:
  • Legibility and readability: Court documents must be easily readable by judges, clerks, and other court personnel. Standardized fonts and sizes ensure that text is clear and legible, reducing the risk of misinterpretation or overlooking important details.
  • Uniformity: Consistent formatting across all documents helps maintain a professional and orderly appearance. It ensures that all submissions are presented in a familiar format, making it easier for court staff to review and process documents efficiently.
  • Compliance: Adhering to the court’s rules demonstrates respect for the judicial process and ensures compliance with legal standards. Non-compliance can result in documents being rejected or delayed, which can adversely affect a case.
  • Professionalism: Using the correct font and formatting conveys a sense of professionalism and attention to detail. It reflects well on the submitting party and their legal representation.
  • Prevention of errors: Standardized formatting reduces the likelihood of errors in document handling and review. It ensures that all required information is easily accessible and accurately presented.
  • Efficiency: Courts handle a large volume of documents daily. Standardized formatting helps streamline the review process, allowing court staff to work more efficiently and effectively.

Failure to follow these formatting rules can lead to documents being rejected or returned for correction, causing delays in legal proceedings and potentially affecting the outcome of a case. Therefore, it is essential to adhere to the prescribed guidelines to ensure smooth and effective communication with the court.


Let’s dig a little deeper into the readability aspect of using the right fonts in California courts.

Many of these documents will be viewed by judges and clerks on a computer or tablet rather than on paper. So we approach readability from that point of view: what will make documents look the best and be easiest to read and understand when seen on a screen?

Here are two examples of block text, similar to what might appear on a document of your own in length if not in content. Both examples technically meet the standards of the court rules, but one offers a better reading experience.

Times New Roman font

Georgia font

Based on our experience, we recommend Cambria, Georgia, or Helvetica fonts, 13 pt. font type, and 1.5 line spacing. Again, either of the above options will be accepted by the court, but when you’re looking for your documents to not just be accepted, but also to convince and support your overall case, the font can go far to help.


When laying out its requirements for what fonts in California courts are broadbly acceptable, the courts are establishing minimums and maximums and expectations for your documents.

Unless it specifically states that a font size be X, or that a brief be written only in Y, you do have some latitude over how your documents appear.

Courts did not want to have to wade through documents written in:

Comic sans, Papyrus, Calligraphy

But if you are using a professional, legible font that is “essentially equivalent” to the traditional fonts that we have long known, and “If your typography conforms to the court rules in good faith, you should be on solid ground.” (Butterick)

In fact, in our 25 years of experience, we have seen documents get rejected for a variety of reasons, but almost never related to font type, and that never on documents that were written in one of the three fonts we suggest.

In recent months, the only times documents have been rejected for font-related reasons were when the font size was too small.

The takeaway for best practices formatting your document?

Bigger is better. Choose the improved font. Left justify. Embrace white space. Aim for readability.

A free, detailed guide on all the basics of eFiling

Learn all the basics about eFiling with this eBook guide. If you have a workflow that needs improving, are new to eFiling, or just want a handy companion guide to share with your colleagues, then this is for you. Download this free eBook now.

    Add a header to begin generating the table of contents

    More to explore

    What is One Legal?

    We’re California’s leading litigation services platform, offering eFiling, process serving, and courtesy copy delivery in all 58 California counties. Our simple, dependable platform is trusted by over 20,000 law firms to file and serve over a million cases each year.

    One Legal Dashboard

    Legal Up Virtual Conference

    Register now to get actionable strategies and inspiration to level up your legal career.